Profile Verification Less Common than Thought Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Written by Chelsey Drysdale   
Wednesday, 20 May 2009 14:21
MILWAUKIE, OR – A recent survey of engineers found that while more 90% were diligent in creating a correct profile, nearly 60% did not display that same diligence when it came to verifying that profile on a regular basis.
 
The survey, conduct by ECD following Apex, asked participants to answer specific questions about their practices regarding thermal processing. The results revealed the perceived difficulty and/or time required were the reasons behind verifying reflow profiles.  
 
Showing degradation of thermally sensitive passive components during reflow to be one of the main causes of product field failure, such degradation often is not picked up by traditional assembly test and inspection, says ECD. Instead, it often appears years later, when the product is in the user’s hands.
 
The firm says profiling remains key to preventing component degradation and product field failures.

blog comments powered by Disqus
 

Columns

What’s Driving Electronics Packaging and Assembly Trends?

Multi-die configurations and a switch to copper wires are rampant, and supercomputers are why.

Read more...
 
Bridging at Reflow

What causes it, and can it be eliminated?

Read more...
 

Features

Current Trends in Conformal Coatings

Custom formulations have become the norm.

Read more...
 
The Worldwide Industrial Electronics Assembly Markets Defined

Test, clean energy and process control represent huge potential for EMS.

Read more...
 

Search

Search

Login

CB Login

Language

Language

English French German Italian Portuguese Russian Spanish
 

Products

Corelis Releases ScanExpress v. 7.7 Boundary Scan Suite
ScanExpress version 7.7 boundary scan tool suite includes improved constraints handling, support for multi-core devices, and new JTAG Embedded Test support for additional Freescale and Texas...