Could a mix of finishes hold up after 20 years in storage?
The 1995/96 testing included solderability testing in accordance with IPC J-STD-002, surface finish oxidation assessment using Sequential Electrochemical Analysis (SERA), and ball bond/wedge bond wirebondability testing in accordance with the MIL-STD-883D, Method 2011.7, test condition C procedures. Testing revealed ENIPIG and the electroless palladium surface finish combinations achieved the desired solderability, shelf life and wirebondability goals. The ENIPIG surface finish was substituted for the dual-gold plating finish configuration to reduce costs and improve overall product integrity.
Spare test specimens with the investigation surface finishes were produced for the study but were not utilized during testing. These specimens were placed in non-sealed polyethylene bags, stored in a 21ºC/30%-65% RH environment and promptly forgotten. The specimens were rediscovered in 2015 after accumulating 20 years of total storage time, thereby providing an opportunity to investigate extreme long-term solderability of a well-characterized set of surface finishes.
Test specimen. The test specimen was a bismaleimidc-triazine (BT) laminate, 0.040" thick with 0.5 oz. copper outer layers sheared into 3" x 3" squares. These 3" x 3" substrates were electroplated with approximately 0.001" of copper prior to the application of each specific test surface finish. The test substrates that contained a nickel layer had approximately 0.0001" to 0.0002" of electroless nickel plating deposited. The 3" x 3" test substrates were diamond cut into six sections approximately 0.5" wide after plating for use in the 1995-96 evaluation. A total of three to five spare specimens that were 20-years-old of each surface finish were available for the new solderability investigation.
Test plan. A sample from each of the surface finishes and thicknesses was initially tested using a Metronelec ST88 wetting balance, following the protocol detailed in IPC J-STD-003C-WAM1. These samples were tested using eutectic SnPb solder and using the prescribed test flux #1. The test temperature was 235°C with a dwell time of 10 sec. in the solder pot. Only two sample groups failed to produce positive wetting forces: the single thickness sample of immersion bismuth and the 3µin palladium over copper sample. Based on these initial screening results, additional samples were cut at random from the sample strips and were tested using the same test protocols. A number of selected samples were assessed using focused ion beam (FIB) microscopy. An FEI Quanta 200-3D dual beam system with a gallium target ablation source and a maximum ablation rate of 0.5µm/min. was used. A layer of platinum was vapor-deposited on the test samples prior to FIB analysis to prevent extraneous ablation damage. Sample assessment was also conducted using a Fischer Technologies XDV-SDD x-ray fluorescence (XRF) system.
Immersion bismuth. Upon visual examination, the immersion bismuth surface finish test coupons appeared heavily oxidized. Wetting balance testing results showed no positive wetting forces were produced, further indicating the bismuth surface finish had diffused into the underlying copper. FIGURE 1 illustrates immersion bismuth wetting balance results.
Immersion silver. The immersion silver surface finish test coupons exhibited some oxidation upon visual examination. Wetting balance testing results showed slow initial wetting times with final positive wetting forces (FIGURE 2). These wetting balance values indicate degradation of the immersion silver surface but no negative impact of diffusion issues as were observed with the immersion bismuth surface finish.
Since current immersion silver surface finishes are typically eight to 16µin thick, it was speculated the original 3µin layer was consumed by oxidation and/or diffusion after 20 years of storage. XRF assessment measured 1.2µin of immersion silver, while FIB assessment measured the immersion silver deposit closer to 2.4µin in thickness (FIGURE 3).
Electroless palladium/copper. The electroless palladium surface finish test coupons covered a palladium thickness range of 3 to 21µin, and some coupon oxidation was evident by visual examination prior to testing. Wetting balance testing results (FIGURE 4) merge multiple tests for electroless palladium with increasing palladium thickness. The thinnest sample, nominally 3µin, was the only group that failed to produce positive wetting forces. The initial wetting times and final forces for the remaining sample groups are very consistent with palladium thickness overall, indicating no apparent negative impact on the protection of the underlying copper for palladium finishes in excess of 3µin.
FIB and XRF assessment were conducted to characterize changes in the electroless palladium layer after 20 years of storage. XRF assessment found no evidence of electroless palladium, but FIB assessment measured the electroless palladium deposit at 0-0.3µin in thickness (FIGURE 5) for the 3µin electroless palladium sample. However, for the 6µin electroless palladium sample, the XRF measurement was 5.6µin, and the FIB measurement was 4 to 6µin (FIGURE 6).
Electroless nickel/immersion gold (ENIG). FIGURE 7 shows wetting balance test data for the ENIG surface finish. Wetting times are somewhat slow and the rates of rise low, which is characteristic of ENIG with some age or stress on the deposit. The porous immersion gold deposit offers good protection to the underlying nickel but not enough to prevent the occurrence of some oxidation. However, the final wetting forces are excellent and meet the requirements of the soon-to-be-released IPC-4552A specification. Increasing flux activity would have a dramatic impact on wetting times and rate of rise but little on the final wetting forces.
FIB and XRF assessment were conducted to characterize the changes in the ENIG plating after 20 years of storage. XRF assessment measured the immersion gold deposit at 4.9µin and the electroless nickel at 406µin. FIB assessment measured the immersion gold deposit at 2.4µin and the electroless nickel at 400µin (FIGURE 8).
Electroless nickel/electroless palladium. FIGURE 9 shows wetting balance test data for electroless nickel/electroless palladium. Overall this group exhibited excellent robustness, with the majority wetting in less than 1 sec. The rates of rise are good, which indicated the presence of only a minor oxide layer that was easily reduced by the rather inactive test flux #1. The spread in the final wetting forces is relatively small, with final forces somewhat lower than ENIPIG surface finish, but excellent overall given the age of the samples.
XRF assessment measured the electroless palladium at 5.11µin and the electroless nickel at 180µin, with the FIB assessment measuring the electroless palladium deposit at 2.6µin and the electroless nickel at 188µin (FIGURE 10) for the 3µin electroless palladium sample. For the 6µin electroless palladium sample, the XRF measurement was 5.95µin for the electroless palladium and 298µin for the electroless nickel, with the FIB measurement at 2.1µin for the electroless palladium and 312µin for the electroless nickel (FIGURE 11).
Electroless nickel/immersion palladium/immersion gold (ENIPIG). FIGURE 12 shows wetting balance test results for the ENIPIG surface finish. Use of immersion gold over the immersion palladium dramatically improved the robustness of the deposit. Wetting times were excellent at under 0.5 sec, even after 20 years of storage. The rates of rise are also excellent to a final wetting force that meets the current requirements of IPC-4556. FIB and XRF assessment were not conducted on the ENIPIG surface finish due to sample quantity constraints.
Copper/electroless nickel/electrolytic gold. FIGURE 14 shows wetting balance test results for the electroless nickel/electrolytic gold surface finish. The thinnest nominal gold deposit was 5µin. The consistency of the group is excellent, with the majority producing positive wetting forces in less than 1 sec. The rates of rise to the final wetting forces are similarly excellent, indicating the gold layer has protected the underlying nickel from passivation.
XRF assessment measured 5.8µin of electrolytic gold and 92µin of electroless nickel. The FIB assessment measured 3.6µin of electrolytic gold and 100µin of electroless nickel (Figure 9).
Printed circuit board surface finishes have evolved during the past 20 years, so the surface finishes in the study are not “apples to apples” with ones used today. Modern board surface finishes are clearly better in terms of consistency/reproducibility, which makes positive solderability test results of these 20-year-old surface finishes reassuring. The following discussion points can be drawn from the data:
The study test results show that a variety of printed circuit board finishes subjected to a storage condition of 21ºC/30%-65% RH in non-sealed polyethylene bags maintained acceptable industry solderability test results after 20 years.
1. D. Hillman, P. Bratin, M. Pavlov, “Wirebondability and Solderability of Various Metallic Finishes for Use in Printed Circuit Assembly,” SMI Conference Proceedings, 1996.
The authors would like to thank Hank Lajoie and Lisa Gamza of MacDermid Enthone Electronic Solutions for outstanding focused ion beam (FIB) microscopy/XRF analysis, and Ross Wilcoxon, Rockwell Collins, for his scathing review of the manuscript.
Ed.: This article was first published in the SMTA International Conference on Soldering and Reliability Proceedings and is reprinted here with author permission.
is president of Solderability Testing and Solutions (standsgroup.com) and is principal materials and process engineer at Rockwell Collins (rockwellcollins.com); email@example.com.